Firstly, the bad news. By whichever metric you choose, Liverpool is in trouble. Our economy is shrinking. Over the past half decade the Office of National Statistics (ONS) records a drop of 0.8%, while every other core city has seen significant growth.

Our population, relative to other cities, is shrinking. Ten years ago, Liverpool’s population – at 441,900 – was larger than Manchester’s 422,900.

Now, after a 19% rise, Manchester’s has broken that symbolic half-million mark, clocking in at 503,100. Liverpool’s has limped to 466,000. Crucially, Manchester has seen its greatest rise in the essential 20-30 year old band: young, wide-eyed economic time-bombs eager to pollinate our post-industrial cities. Liverpool’s population is projected to rise at the lowest rate of increase of all of the core cities.

Tax revenues from jobs and businesses in Liverpool lag way behind those of other cities, according to a recent study by the Centre for Cities. The reason? Not enough high skilled jobs.

Our broadband provision is poorer than other cities - according to the ONS, the rate of social and digital exclusion in Liverpool is 69 per cent compared with a national average of 40 per cent. Some 92,000 people in the city have never been online.

Looking at how well connected city centre firms were to superfast fibre optic broadband, Deloitte found that only four of the companies they surveyed were up to speed. Their conclusion? With the rise of cloud computing the need for high internet speeds has become more acute and a slow connection can have a serious impact on business productivity.

Part of the reason for our city’s broadband not-spots? Liverpool missed out on a slice of the government’s £150m Urban Broadband Fund which could’ve extended access out to areas like Kensington, Everton and Anfield where it’s really needed. 13 cities bid for 10 slots and somehow we managed to finish in the bottom three, and failed to secure a single penny.

Notwithstanding the very real and pressing problem of Government funding cuts affecting how the Council pays for essential services (problems affecting other northern cities doing way better than us, by the way), the question we must all focus on now is, where do we go from here?

Because this is no party political rant. These are the facts. This is where we’re at.

Old Tribal Allegiances Won’t Get Us Out of This Mess

In this city, tribal allegiances - religion, football, politics - always produce more heat than light. It’s a way to shut down conversation, disengage, divert attention: oh, another anti-labour piece from SevenStreets, is the knee-jerk reaction we’re totally expecting. But the state of our city, and the scale of the problem, is way more important than empty political posturing. Our duelling politicians - within the city, and its greater combined authority - have to accept: they’re part of the problem. Their playground tantrums (we’re looking at you, Joe) have made us a laughing stock. Greater devolution? Let’s evolve out of the sandpit first, eh?

Now is the time to interrogate our most fundamental belief systems, to test if they still hold water. And it’s a simple question: can we trust our politicians - alone - with the keys to our future success? With their failed Joint Ventures, their selling off of landmark buildings to known criminals for £1, allowing prime property deals to be secured without due tendering process, dithering over an essential cruise terminal location, presiding over the horror that is Anfield’s tinned up community, refusing to engage with the Localism Act by blocking the introduction of a neighbourhood plan for the waterfront - a plan that would have allowed residents to have a greater say in how their community develops for the benefit of residents and businesses alike.

We sat in on a full Council meeting recently, and it was the most depressing evening we’ve had in a long time. It was, in Friends-speak, ‘The one where Joe defended his £90,000 legal fees to keep his pension for a job he was dismissed from’. To a wo/man, the labour councillors all cheered and back-slapped our leader’s defence. Labour councillors in wards like Clubmoor, where households’ average annual income range starts at £10,400. It was a grotesque display of shoring up the sandbanks while, outside, our city was shrinking. Our young people were leaving. Our broadband was sputtering. Not one Labour councillor, throughout the entire meeting, dared even hint at a disagreement with anything. They acted less like sentient beings, and more like parts on a production line at Halewood. This wasn’t democracy in action. It was a closed shop.

Our Council is Disconnected to the Real Story

Time and again, our Council shows how blindsided it is with what’s really happening - and fails to capitalise on what may just be the most brilliant route out of our situation. Demolish the houses and scatter the community, it says of the Granby Four Streets, just before they scoop the Turner Prize. Get into bed with Geraud, it decides, just as the ground-up localism food movement takes off everywhere else. Silence the nightclubs, it demands, as the Kazimier’s finale makes national press. Destroy Hope Street with ho-hum student flats, it approves, just after it wins best Street at the Civic Awards. Let the speculators and the investors build, it concludes, after the world wakes up to the fact that that model is over.

Cities are here to stay. But things are about to get interesting. Now, real questions are being asked: is growth, in and of itself, a good thing? And how big can they be before the current model eats itself? Already, the world’s megacities are witnessing power outages, water shortages and gridlocked roads. Yet, increasingly, the world’s cities are engaged in a breathless race towards some hyper-shiny vision of a sleek, monotonous metropolis, with monorails and malls, and villages in the sky.

But soon, a city will emerge that will break the mould. Because this model is broken in every possible sense. The pursuit of more has proved hollow. Urgently we need to find something to replace it. The vast problems of global pollution, the single minded pursuit of profit, and the social inequality that always follows. Within our own city the poverty gap is obscene, yet still we lionise the ‘Liverpool Look’ - the gaudy tat dripping down the padded walls of our new hotels. It’s insane. And, whatsmore, it’s unsustainable.

Time For a New Model of What a City Could Be?

Could Liverpool be that city? The city that rewrote the rulebook? The city that said ‘it doesn’t have to be this way’? We think it could.

Because here’s the good news. Something extraordinary is happening in Liverpool. Almost as if a fundamental law of physics is being enacted: as an equal and opposite reaction to the paucity of vision from our leaders, there are industrious, inventive and passionate people engaged in real change. Sure, not speculative flats thrown up overnight offering a 7% yield to pension funds. But schemes and start-ups appropriate for a city with an 800 year old history. New businesses, CICs and social enterprises with a viable future - delivering products and services that we need, and want.

SevenStreets believes that real jobs come from a feedback loop between customers and businesses. We are the true job creators, not Amazon barns and Sainsbury’s sheds. And, yes, it takes time to grow and nurture a good job. But, boy, is it worth it.

The world is changing. Just look at the scandal of zero hours contracts, chain restaurants’ tipping furore, the rise of ‘tax shaming’ the multinationals. People are realising that big corporations don’t offer the panacea we thought they did. So why should our cities continue to carat-dangle incentive schemes and prime plots to fabricated Chinese investors?

Burned out by McJobs, more of us are willing to risk entrepreneurship, crowdfunding and collaboration as a viable alternative, creating wealth for themselves - and wealth that, crucially, circulates in the local economy. That’s why Bold Street has seen over 30 new businesses start up in the past couple of years. It’s why Independent Liverpool seized the moment so successfully. It’s why Homebaked keeps the home fires of Anfield burning, and why Engage invites the world’s best urban thinkers here for their seminars.

The City Needs to Connect Stronger, and Deeper, With Us

Increasingly, people are tapping into a new source of energy. Why we give a damn about the future of Lime Street, of libraries, and of our green spaces. Because we’re all, more than ever before, aware of what we stand to lose if we continue on this path. We stand to lose the city. Look at what we’ve lost already, and project forward what we stand to lose if we don’t, now, say enough.

Liverpool’s creative sector is resurgent. Moreover it is resilient. We know how to magic up inspirational co-working hubs, art, virtual race tracks, smart technology, biennials and festivals. And we have the warehouses, the infrastructure, the talent and the drive to punch persuasively above our weight. What could we have done with Millennium House? With St Andrew’s Church? With the streets and history we’ve wiped from the map? If we were only given the keys, rather than them going to another identikit hotel or student castle. Heck, let the city’s creative communities run a hotel: imagine how amazing that would be. No padded headboard required.

We’re not saying we want a city full of cocktail bars, artisan bakers or vintage festivals. But these people have already proved their mettle. They are our raw materials. They have conjured up something from nothing. And this is an infinitely transferable skill. A skill that’s way more useful than a life spent being paid by the public purse. People determined to make something of themselves, better their communities, create a social infrastructure that’s built on what we need now, not on some artists’ impression of how we’ll live in a vague, Sci-Fi future.

Not every city can be Shanghai, or even Manchester. Not every city should be. But every city that stands a shot at survival needs to be distinctive. Make us a city that is inherently different, and then we become a much easier sell. When you become a place that people want to live in, it’s a sure bet that you become a place where people want to invest in. And with every new development that pushes us - and our culture - out of the picture, that future looks ever more uncertain.

We think it’s time for a change. We think collaboration - true, sleeves-rolled-up, honest collaboration - is the only way forward.

In his new year message, Joe Anderson says that ‘Liverpool has a long, proud, tradition of protest for social change, but we are at our best when we ARE the social change. Liverpool is famous around the world not for complaining about things, but for changing things.’

Fine words. But, Joe, but no one complains more than you. We should know. And, also, what’s your definition of change? Because, if it’s New Wolstenholme Square (pic r), we’ll pass, thanks. That looks like our definition of ‘more of the same’.

So how can we work together when you block anyone who disagrees with you on Twitter? How can we effect change when you surround yourself with yes people? How can we start a dialogue when you refuse to listen?

So, What Happens Now?

Maybe, just maybe, the answers to our problems have been here all along - that DoES Liverpool could have helped map out a smarter broadband provision than the millions wasted on BT, that our local food heroes could have created a better market offer than Geraud’s sorry sheds, that the Kazimier collective could have imagined a brighter future for Wolstenholme Square, that the Liverpool Lantern Co could have engineered our own Giants instead of us importing them, that our gaming community could have been given the breaks we were so keen to give to Sony. That Granby and Homebaked could work with the fractured communities that encircle our city, and give them hope.

But all of this takes time. And money. But not much money. We’ve spent over £40,000 on awards ceremonies in the past couple of years. For what? A big night out and some bad press. Imagine how many startups that could have seeded?

In smart cities, the rise of collaboration is unstoppable. Cities mature enough to admit that their politicians don’t hold all the answers. Many people have figured out that it doesn’t make any sense to work in silos, when it’s never been easier to pull together. What sense does it make to turn your back on the thousands of people in our city who want to be part of the change?

Collaborative economy concepts are being implemented right now. Sharing, helping, learning, opening up. We are not passive consumers. We are citizens. And we, not transient public servants, hold the keys to our future.

Over in the States, MIT’s Dayna Cunningham believes in the power of listening. With big problems - like ours - the solution requires out-of-the-Town-Hall-box thinking. “We consider people from different social positions as colleagues,” she says. “Poor people actually are experts on problems, from illness to dealing with life without money. Yet in a bad economy, no one asks them how they make ends meet, often because they’ve been told what they think doesn’t matter.” Does that sound like a story close to home, to you?

Her Community Innovators Lab now works with community organizations - with people at the margins “because they offer tremendous insight,” she says, adding that the lab casts the poor not only as those with problems but as inventors of creative approaches.

“We have people—from soccer moms to police chiefs to kids in hoodies—whose life experiences are counterintuitive, whose life truths are opposite, and we put them together around the table and get them to co-create solutions.”

Guess what? We haven’t got the answer. But here’s what SevenStreets suggests: Liverpool does the same. Sets up a parliament of the people, for the people. No one can hold a light to our creativity, so why is no-one talking to us? We might never be an economic powerhouse again. But is that so bad? Surely our goal is to live in a city that functions better, that cares for its citizens, that offers opportunities for all. A city that’s generous and tolerant. That connects with itself at a deeper level than retweets of sunsets. A city that knows where it’s going.

Because, make no mistake, we’re all connected like never before. And if we don’t work together, we’ll continue to fall apart.

Main image: Jeff Wong

  • asenseofplace

    Welcome back. And yes, it’s down to all of us. Because we are Liverpool, we - as the man says - ARE the social change.

  • Jane Nolan

    I agree for the most part but we DO need help from outisde ageencies too…..The Giants was a fantastic experience and kindled the imagination (and we have lots of that) of young and old alike. It brought in welcome revenue for us. I’m not sure a homegrown event could ever have had the same impact? Look. When you see what’s happening in Bold Street it’s a symbolic finger sign to Liverpool One and I love that; but I also believe they can run side by side and they do. What we need to realize is the Bold Street phenomenon was created independently, organically and gained momentum spontaneously. So my bugbear is that vision not being tapped into enough. Sure, let the Duke of whoever buy up half of the city but hey, couldn’t he have at least embraced the local businesses whose love for their home city was stronger than any fste indexed motivated share holder?

  • Matt

    Would really disagree re: Giants. There’s so many amazing creative collectives across the region who could do something impressive and engaging and wide-reaching given the right energy and support. You only have to look at the success of the Lantern Parade or something to see the potential’s there.

  • Mike

    Liverpool has plenty of potential to be an “economic powerhouse”.

    I think the biggest problem is how poorly people are informed and how little they now seem to know about any economic or political issues, or how that might impact on them and their futures.

    One of the biggest roles of “the media” in the UK is in holding the political machinery to account through public examination of issues, querying and checking any statements made, following up on and testing commitment to issues important to the public. Through putting politics on the front page and keeping it there, ensuring that politicians are answerable to the public for their performance.

    Other than this blog (of limited reach), where now is this political examination evident in our city, for our city, in either quality or quantity?

  • Rich

    David Lloyd for PM. Now. :-)

  • http://peterirate.blogspot.com John Bradley

    Liverpool’s creative sector is a joke, inward looking, unimaginative.
    You might not like the flats on Hope Street, you may have preferred the car park but all the independents you like could never have scraped up the money to do anything. It would rot along with Lime Street for another 20 years.
    No one has held the independents back but they have still not achieved the rebirth of Liverpool. The ideal that “a prophet is without honour in his own land” does have some weight in Liverpool belittling everything that does happen but this article is as much a part of that attitude as it is a reaction to it.
    The people who did the creative stuff at the Kasimir will move on to knew things having learnt from what they have done. The ones who moan the loudest will be those who tagged along and have now lost the coat tails the hitched a lift on. The one thing that Liverpool does need is change but the reactionary forces of the cultural sector are just as strong as those in other areas. It is just different things they want stopped.
    BTW Why has no one mentioned that the destroyers of Mello Mello were non other than their fellow independents the Shipping forecast? The idea that independents are in for cooperation is a ludicrous concept.

  • Jane Nolan

    The Lantern company or such like could not even begin to compete with what Jean Luc produced. That is apparent. However, community based projects are to be welcomed and encouraged.