How To Save The Met Quarter
Why is the Met Quarter struggling to hold on to its tenants? Sevenstreets wonders - is it time to raise the roof?
It’s Thursday afternoon, and the delivery guy is unloading a handful of boxes destined for TM Lewin, the fancy shirt suppliers at the Met Quarter.
“We never deliver much here,” he tells Sevenstreets, “our policy is only to deliver when the existing stock has been sold. So, basically, we’re only delivering a handful of new lines every week.”
The result? TM Lewin in the Met Quarter doesn’t get the sharp new designs - the latest must have colour combinations for sharp-dressed city slickers - until last season’s stock has, eventually, slunk off the shelves. Hardly ideal for a destination which prides itself on its fashion credentials.
“The Trafford Centre does such good business that they’re always getting the new ranges in first,” he says, adding: “It’s dead here.”
Talk of death might be exaggerated but, front of house, the Met Quarter’s certainly looking peaky. With every new closure, the fashion mall looks ever more gap-toothed and becomes less of a destination, and more a cut-through from Victoria Street to Liverpool One. We’ve just counted nine empty stores. And, roughly, 19 shoppers.
They’ve a name for this in retail circles. The Met Quarter is fast becoming a Ghost Box.
And how long do we give Flannels, now that it’s opened up in Liverpool One? Will it, like Kirsty Doyle before it, simply accept that this town ain’t big enough for two branches?
Even on payday weekends, the central avenue of the Met Quarter is hushed, calm and crowd-free, when it should be bustling and animated. And plenty have tried to make it so.
Mark Paddock attempted to add some life into the proceedings with his Smoothie Express bar. “It just wasn’t worth it,” he says, “they wanted £25,000 a year in rent, and there was no way that anyone could recoup that. There just wasn’t the footfall. Some mornings you’d be lucky if you saw more than a handful of people.”
The site, rising from the shell of the city’s old Central Post Office, was opened in 2006 after half a century’s neglect and dithering - the Walton Group sitting on the rubble until Milligan bought it in 2004. Milligan had previous, dubious, experience in creating loftily ambitious ‘designer’ malls. Opening The Triangle in Manchester’s spruce new post-bomb development, they presided over a retail black-hole aimed at ‘Manchester’s Urban Achievers’ (you can see those deathly demographic profiler Powerpoints flashing in your head, can’t you?)
The Triangle bombed. It’s now owned by The Morley Fund, who tell us “It’s become the centre of fashion, culture and leisure for the young.”
It hasn’t. It’s a space scrabbling for a soul.
Milligan have bailed out of the Met Quarter too. Today it’s owned by Anglo Irish Bank Private Banking and Alanis Capital.
So why don’t we visit this £100million pound addition to the city’s retail offering. And what can we do to save it? Because, despite the fact that Samsonite’s gone, we still want the Met Quarter to succeed. We couldn’t live without our Molton Brown, and Paperchase usually comes up with the goods. So let’s see if we can’t turn this thing around, eh?
1) Raise The Roof
Pity the Met Quarter - it spent most of the money on erecting a new ceiling for the roofless shell, just when everyone else realised that Mall 2.0 was resolutely roof free. Take Liverpool One - its South John Street and Paradise Street developements are proudly open to the elements. Add a roof - and, crucially, a door - and the mall becomes closed off: somewhere you visit for a need, rather than to stroll through and browse. Lift the roof off the Met Quarter and watch the footfall flow back. Unless it’s raining, of course.
At the corner of Third Street and Fairfax Boulevard in Los Angeles, The Grove shopping centre is, to all intents and purposes, a mall. But it - like Liverpool One - is open to the elements. The plants are real, the air is fresh, and the accent is on ‘leisure’, not just ‘retail’. It opened in 2002 and revolutionised the retail landscape - plenty of time for Milligan, if they’d have done their research, to follow the acknowledged shopping capital of the world, and see the way the wind was blowing.
This year, every new shopping centre built in the USA will be roofless. Even in decidedly chilly Massachusetts - so don’t talk to us about Liverpool’s temperamental climate. If we’re hard enough to shop in our PJ’s and rollers, we can handle a little drizzle, thanks.
The Met Quarter PR Machine made a big noise, when it opened, about having ‘the world’s largest sculpture’ on its ceiling. In reality, it’s just a fancy light fitting - but it might well be a candidate for the world’s biggest retail mistake.
2) Ditch the Demographics
Why do we continue with the illusion that, to be successful, you need to pitch at the Urban Achievers? The Marketing Department’s wet dream: the young, affluent, stylish and totally illusory. The further down Niche Avenue you go, the less likely you are to stand a chance in this city (see also Champu - Herbert’s Champagne Bar). London’s Neil’s Yard area is a brilliant example of how top end fashions, funky independents, snack shops and pop-up boutiques can mix and mingle, and attract shoppers of every hue. Not just orange. Sure, you can focus on the fabled A’s and B’s in London or Tokyo, but, back in the real world, we’ll mix our Armani Exchange with our Primark - so why fear jumbling up the retail offer a bit? Has the Met Quarter been too selective in its mix?
3) Join The Dots
For all Liverpool BID’s campaign to ensure the smooth transition between Liverpool One and the city’s old shopping core, there’s a definite feeling, as you walk away from Liverpool One towards the Met Quarter, you’re leaving Paradise (Street) behind. It’s not just the temporary gadget shops, or the crap busker statues dressed in soiled sheeting. It’s the smell. Nowhere in the city smells worse than the drains of Whitehall Whitechapel. Yes, we know that’s where the ancient ‘pool’ of Liverpool once flowed. But, really, we can do without the history lesson. Have a coffee outside Fratellis on a particularly pungent day and you can practically taste the effluent. We don’t know what BID’s plans are. But we’d suggest this 100 metre stretch is the biggest gap in the city (and that’s even since Gap moved out) - and needs urgent attention.
4) Add some Fun
Since when did shopping have to be so serious anyway? For the Met Quarter to really seize the initiative (and assuming the roof stays) it should look to Sweden. Here, malls really are ‘mixed leisure’ - they even welcome Mall Rats, with skateparks and graffiti walls. At Gallerian, the city’s newest mall, there’s a huge spa - Allexon’s (http://www.axelsonsspa.se/) where stressed Swedes can strip, sauna and stretch out while a fierce Nordic athlete pummels their muscles. When Flannels goes, we say add a day spa - and keep it open at night, too. The Met Quarter is, belatedly, trying, with a fussball contest taking place over the World Cup - but is this taking place in extra time?
5) More Food, Please
Yes, we were gutted when that renowned culinary aesthete, Natasha Hamilton, closed her not-in-any-way-egotistical Hamilton’s coffee shop. But all the best malls have food. And, save for a chocolate twist at Costa Coffee, the Met Quarter’s hardly a gastronomic hotspot. Yeah, we know, to fit into the stuff at Armani Exchange you’re gonna have to cut out carbs for a year. But for the rest of us, what’s wrong with a little light refreshement? What about a wine bar? A deli? A sushi bar - anything that adds to the sociability of the place. Heck, we’d even be happy with another chain restaurant. We hear Raymond Blanc is still looking for a home in the city: I bet he could take on Cafe Rouge and come up smelling of tart tatin.
To succeed, the Met Quarter needs to work hard to become a destination in its own right - and to offer something more. Whether it becomes a mixed leisure venue, or appeals more to thrifty shoppers, something better change.
Loyal tenants will only renew their leases for so long. The key to survival is a stark choice. Change or die.
Thoughtful article - nice to see an article about the city that actually offers some alternatives rather than just criticising.
it was always going to be interesting to see how the Met Quarter coped as soon as Liverpool One opened - I think unless they start using their imagination in a similar way to your ideas then it’s days are numbered. It’s shop selection policy is so similar to the way the city is being developed, this idea that everyone in the city is some sort of high flyer with a massive amount of disposable income to get rid of every week - it’d be lovely for the local shop owners if this was true but it patently isn’t.
I hope the Met Quarter finds a way to success - it’d be a terrible shame to see such a beatiful building fall into disuse once more.
Yeah, we’re with you - it’s great to see investment in the city (especially when that site was off limits for so long) but it’s all too blinkered. Man cannot live on Armani alone! Seems every time I go in there, there’s another blank shop front. Let’s hope they’ve got a cunning plan…
The Neal’s Yard comparison is an interesting one. Surely the MetQuarter can still be ‘picky’ about its tenants BUT not have to pander to some imaginary High Fligher demographic? They could still keep the likes of Gieves and Hawkes/Flannels/Armani but add in interesting boutiques, cool food stores, whatever, without having to let pound shops in. It has the potential to be a really bustling great place, and at the moment it’s just not.
That bit between Liverpool One and the Met Quarter is absolutely shocking. In a horror film it would be the stretch that our intrepid group has to cross to get to safety, but you just know not all of them are going to make it…
Gut it an give it to Selfridges | Harvey Nicks then you have Lewis’ and Selfridges as anchor tenants at each end of the trawl. Ok it’s facist and includes no independents but it would work and drag the Liverpool One sphere of influence a bit wider
I’m sure Selfridges would do a great job with it, actually. But it still caters to that higher end of the market - and the Metquarter’s proved that, in that area at least, the really ‘high end’ stuff just doesn’t seem to work (or at least it doesn’t in its current form). It would be a great brand to have in the city though.
i’m always amazed at how harvey nicks survives in MCR - it always looks empty to me. I think it’s the terrifying window displays of dismembered mannequins. Selfridges have put a halt on any new developments too. Liverpool ONE was going to have a third anchor store - some big European department store. But it never happened. I’d vote for Macy’s!
Want to get me into Met Quarter? Kill two birds with one stone and relocate L1’s WH Smiths into a couple of combined units at Met Quarter from the cramped oven it currently shares with the Post Office.
I used to pay a visit into Smiths almost every time I popped into town. Okay, some of those times I was just reading/browsing, but I also bought a lot from there. Now that Smiths has its new home in L1, I do my utmost to avoid it.
I don’t know if its bad Feng Shui, but the new store just doesn’t work for me at all. The layout is confusing, there’s no natural flow around the shop, and the heat in there makes reading uncomfortable. Perhaps, cranking up the heat and humidity was a deliberate ploy to accelerate the process of browsing-to-purchasing, but it just doesn’t do it for me.
I like to browse reading material. I like to browse it in a comfortable environment. I’m not asking for a chair, but sheesh!
Anyway, back on topic… Put the old-style Smiths into Met Quarter and I’d probably pop in during my visits to the city centre.
I was fortunate to have some contact with the MQ scheme at the conception stage. The project took guts. It was market inspired and carefully researched. It was pitched at the large amount of high end fashion money spent in Manchester originating from Liverpool postcodes. It was first to market and beat Liverpool One by almost a year and it overcame some complex historical site issues.
It was well designed, for a mall, with attention to detail and high quality materials,.It was delivered by a highly creative team. There was a lot of thought given to fittings, furnishings, lighting, sound systems, textiles, art and more. Even during the construction phase, art was embedded in the build process with JMU and other students decorating the construction hoardings. Inside were imaginative tapestries and window designs by Deborah Steggels. Then John Milligan sold it to a bank. And that’s the answer to the problem. They run it as an investment and not a customer journey experience. Pity, as I like it and it could work so well.
Interesting article. I’ve heard Metquarter has no intention of being Liverpool One’s poor relation and that there’s loads of new brands coming soon. Be interesting to see if the rumours are true and what difference they make..
couldn’t agree more. WH Smiths is a disgrace. Used to be great. What a shame. Great idea, too.
I remember the art on the hoardings. Some of them were excellent. I asked the builders if I could have one when they were done. They said no.
I think the Met was struggling even before Liverpool 1 opened.
I say lower the rents, scrap the business rates and get some truly unique independents in there. Give the city and its visitors something a bit different!
Whitehall is in London. The Met Quarter is in Whitechapel.
I too was involved heavily with MQ when it opened it doors, at the time I co-owned the agency that created all the campaigns, the artwork and the branding (post london agency who devised the MQ brand concept). It was quite unique, visionary and had a strong mission statement. When Milligan pulled out it was a sad day, we realized the vision and the creativity would be lost on a bank, who at the end of the day are interested in one thing.. the bottom line. Management didn’t have the confidence to experiment anymore, catering to the demands of the board than to the market.
It took allot of cash to generate the footfall, and the tennant mix at the time was right, however, with the opening of L1 the focus was always going to shift. I don’t see an easy answer to the problem, re-addressing the mix and lowering the brand positioning would eventually lead to to a slightly more glamorous clayton square. The major issue with MQ is its location - parking is a nightmare so its not a first point destination, unlike L1 which has dedicated parking. If it where down to me, I would re-position MQ as a true destination, not just a mall, it needs a new strategy, refocus on what the market wants, not what is presumed the market needs - It has the space to accommodate well managed and targeted events, and address the issue of attracting a HNW anchor tenant - free 3 year rental etc etc. A new vision is needed, and an experienced retail / destination management team essential.
high net worth anchor tenants, sure, but also, the holistic lifestyle element is key - especially if it’s to compete with the nine o’clock opening hours of the Met. I think a bar, or something along those lines, is its true saviour. Drink kinda unites us all.
It’d be a great place to hold events, actually.
It needs to find a balance between high-end and ‘lower end’ (accessible and funky but not cheap). The high-end atmosphere is stifling and unfriendly. Food or a bar is definitely the way to go.