The Top Ten UNESCO Bad Boys. And Us.

In the week that UNESCO is set to deliver its written report to Liverpool Council, it's time to put the whole affair into context. We're not the only city caught between the past and the future. We're in very good company...

We know we’re on the UNESCO naughty stair (but what a stair. It’s got that beautiful worn patina of age, and is authentically vernacular) but it’s good to know we’re in great company…

The near-hysterical coverage of the recent UNESCO threat to strike us from their of list World Heritage Status sites omitted to mention just how commonplace this conundrum is.

Nowhere does the Echo, the Guardian, the BBC or the Liverpool Preservation Trust, say that, at any one time, UNESCO are threatening to withdraw their favour from dozens of sites across the globe. It’s just not that unusual. They practically hand these gongs out on comical elasticated string. Talk about the boy who cried ‘heritage!’.

The world, as John Barnes once sort-of-rapped, is in motion. World Heritage sites are always in a state of flux. At least those in dynamic cities are. They’re the Schrodinger’s Cat of attractions: in a suspended state of being and yet not being. When is a World Heritage Sight safe? When it’s wrapped in cling film and left in stasis.

This week, Liverpool Council is set to receive the inspectors’ report - which will, in turn, be sent to Peel; architects of the controversial £5.5billion Liverpool Waters development at the heart of UNESCO’s ire. “This goes too far” said chief inspector Ron van Oers at the time. There’s a man who’s never seen Take Me Out, then.

UNESCO will then vote on its findings this June. In the meantime, we salute our top ten World Heritage sites currently on the naughty stair with us.

As we wait for the findings, let’s remember the words of Barnsey:

They’ll always hit you and hurt you/defend and attack/there’s only one way to beat them/get round the back…

Hmmm, maybe that goes too far. But we’ll do it for our city. Before they do it to us. Three graces on our shirts, and all that…

Istanbul

Ancient wooden warehouses in shocking state. Council opting to spend on new apartment blocks for poor people to, like, actually live in. It’s all too much. And that bridge proposal across the Golden Horn to alleviate the growing city’s congestion? UNESCO are livid. No-one touches their pristine horn and gets away with it. It straddles two continents, we’ve heard.

Mont Saint Michel

Plans to build wind turbines that could blight the spectacular view of this medieval island pilgrimage, crowned by an 11th century Benedictine abbey. UNESCO fart in their general direction. Handy on those stubborn wind free days.

Norwegian Fjords

Power lines across the spectacular Geirangerfjord have got UNESCO chiefs in such a mood it’s a definite nuls points. And, in a show of solidarity, they refused to sing Take On Me at the Christmas Karaoke this year.

Zanzibar Old Town

Plans for a swish five star hotel within the old stone town walls made UNESCO fact finders so cross on a recent visit they stole all the toiletries and left without paying for the in-room porn (which, to them, is Dan Cruickshank vinegar stroking an Etruscan vase).

Edinburgh

If UNESCO see ONE MORE WHEELIE BIN in Edinburgh’s Old Town they’ll snap. Honestly. And so help us, it’s gonna get messy. We’ve a suggestion: if they really want medieval authenticity, residents should throw their shit out of the windows onto the statue of Greyfriar’s Bobby. Ah, the good old days.

Pompeii

It’s a definite Up Pompeii from UNESCO. Talk about bad luck. First, the inhabitants of this idyllic seaside town get horribly burned and suffocated then, to add insult to life-extinguishing injury, UNESCO come along and complain that ‘visitor services aren’t up to scratch’. Call the cops. And get Costa Coffee in, pronto.

Nessebar, Bulgaria

The old town of Nessebar, a popular tourist spot, is being developed at too high a rate. Yeah, whatever. What has Bulgaria ever given us? Oh, apart from the only member of Ladytron who’s never lived here? Bulldoze it.

Panama

The Panama coastal highway (used by UNESCO to visit this historic district) is causing clear and present petulance to UNESCO. And that man who pretended to die in a freak Canoeing accident bought a flat there. That, understandably, was the last straw.

Victoria Falls

The falls, formed 150 million years ago, are in imminent danger, according to UNESCO, because of Zambia and Zimbabwe’s inability to draft up a Joint Management Team and an Integrated Management Plan for the site. Mass murderer Mugabe must be ready to throw in the towel any day now.

Lanzarote

This popular holiday hotspot is, according to UNESCO, a hotbed of illegal and highly offensive hotels. And we should know, we booked a last minute all-inclusive there last summer. Shocking polyester duvets, and there’s no way that was a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc. The nerve.

So yeah, UNESCO then. Quicker to anger than Kevin Keegan in a tight spot. And you know what, we might have angered the UNESCO Gods. But we’d love it if we beat them.




Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
GaryKilroy 5 pts

If there had been a UNESCO 200-300 years ago we wouldn't have a waterfront as they would have object to the city draining the brackish tidal pool that the current waterfront sits atop of. Every development in the last 20 years along the waterfront has been vigorously opposed by various groups on the grounds that the waterfront will be ruined yet it has never looked better. Lets get it built and move forward!

VapourTrails 5 pts

Heritage can be worth a great deal of money and jobs, so i do not think we should consider just throwing it away for the sake of Peel holdings. One of the questions that should be considered is the question of jobs and the figures that are thrown around for this project. If in the building of Liverpool Waters, all the jobs in construction etc, were to go to Liverpool people, then that would be a major factor to consider. However we all know that this will not happen, it never happens in Liverpool, so we could throw away a valuable tourist designation and get the crumbs. When people quote the job numbers to be gained from Liverpool Waters (or any other project), we need to ask where they get the figure from on the jobs count and who will get those jobs. Its very similar to Building Schools for the Future, who gets the job to not only build but also to design. It is surely not beyond Peel and Liverpool City Council to go ahead with Liverpool Waters and still keep the UNESCO designation.

Peel have altered the plans several times. First class watefront? Have you been to the northern docks? Without skyscrapers the development would be mediocre like what they did with the southern docks. You know, the city got carved up by developers 200 years ago when a bunch of capitalist property developers built the docks and warehouses that we now gush over. Then later on another bunch of capitalist property developers filled in an old dock and built the 'three graces' to make their businesses look good and to make money. The Halewood car factory was built on top of a mediocre ancient monument, but what would you rather have now, the 5,000 jobs there or some old moat? The northern docks are a mess, no one else has a viable alternative plan for them and as this article points out, UNESCO's well meaning does not always mean they know what it right. I've been to Dresden, the bridge that cost them the world heritage status they built looks fine and was neccesary for a very historic but deprived city to develop their economy. They did the right thing and we should too. The city stands at a crossroads, we can be dragged back down into the mire by the moaners or we can move forward for a change.

I recently read that UNESCO tried to get the Tower of London to refill its moat for WHS Status. The City of London's planners politely told them where to go, as they have done with approval for skyscrapers and office buildings round the Tower. There's preserving historic environments, and there's placing it under a bell jar and being surprised when nothing grows.

Robin Brown 7 pts

You know what would be good though? Peel said 'yes, it's reasonable that we alter our plans in a way that doesn't detract from the first-class Liverpool waterfront so that the city can retain its world heritage status that currently acts on a brake to the city centre being carved up by developers who don't give two hoots for heritage, architecture or the built environment'.

Conversation from Facebook

Itz Nicko Timez

How can they sell it on the cheap unless its been left to rot?

Tommy Burgess

get on with building liverpool waters all that old dockland is a dump that liverpool people have been kept away from. build a new future for the many young people who are being left to rot and give them hope.

Review: Gathering Jack at The Casa

— A Liverpool-flavoured Ripper update, Gathering Jack was an enjoyable and imaginative production with genuine moments of the uncanny.

Notable & noticed
13 February 2012

Tweetsourcing: A Mayor for Liverpool

— Our Twitter feed provides an insight into who the people for mayor of Liverpool....

13 February 2012

Threshold festival 2012: In pictures

— We’re absolutely exhausted. We spent the weekend at Threshold 2012 - the city’s largest, best, and most ridiculously full grassroots music and arts festival. The...

Our picks

London calling: Spector at the Kazimier

Uber-hyped guitar pop boys Spector this month show the Kazimier why they're on every 'most likely to' list for 2012. Plus: win tickets.

Robert Dietz interview: mUmU’s 4th Birthday hits the Black-E

Liverpool clubbing institution mUmU celebrates four years this weekend - and they've got DJ heavyweight Robert Dietz headlining the Black-E. He speaks to Stephanie Heneghan before the big night.

Radar: Tarnished Earth

Stark, beautiful and terrifying, Tarnished Earth is an outdoor photographic exhibition at Liverpool ONE you'll find hard to ignore...

Radar: Fanfarlo at Static

With more instruments than Curly's warehouse, Fanfarlo return with their infectious hands-across-the-Baltic bag of tunes. We're going, you should too.
The best of Sevenstreets, directly to your inbox

© 2010 Sevenstreets.com | All rights reserved